» Goldsmiths Solicitors https://goldsmithsllp.com Top Business Law Firm, Lagos | Abuja | Nigeria Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:37:36 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://goldsmithsllp.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Goldsmiths-LLP-Icon-300px-e1659753938146-150x150.png » Goldsmiths Solicitors https://goldsmithsllp.com 32 32 An Overview of CBN’s Operational Guidelines for Open Banking in Nigeria https://goldsmithsllp.com/an-overview-of-cbns-operational-guidelines-for-open-banking-in-nigeria/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-overview-of-cbns-operational-guidelines-for-open-banking-in-nigeria Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:37:36 +0000 https://goldsmithsllp.com/?p=8555 Introduction By a Circular dated 7th March 2023, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) released the “Operational Guidelines for Open Banking in Nigeria” (‘the Guidelines’). The Guidelines set out rules…

The post An Overview of CBN’s Operational Guidelines for Open Banking in Nigeria first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>
Introduction

By a Circular dated 7th March 2023, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) released the “Operational Guidelines for Open Banking in Nigeria” (‘the Guidelines’). The Guidelines set out rules for sharing the data/information of customers between participants in the open banking system. Although not defined in the Guidelines, open banking system may be defined as the exchange of the data of an entity’s customers with other entities for the purpose of providing innovative financial services. Thus, the Guidelines recognize the right of customers to privacy and data protection and set out the rules for engaging in open banking in Nigeria. It among other things, stipulates technical requirements/considerations for operating in the open banking system, identifies the risks associated with open banking to include cyber security, data privacy and integrity, product management, money laundering and regulatory compliance, and outlines the rules to manage these risks.

In this article, we highlight some salient provisions of the Guidelines such as who the participants in open banking are, the obligations of participants, regulatory oversight functions, policies/frameworks to be formulated by participants, reporting obligations, intellectual property issues and risk management.

Participants in Open Banking Operations

These are the organizations/persons who may engage in the exchange of customers’ data for the purpose of providing/receiving innovative financial services. Participants in open banking are classified based on the roles and the services they provide as follows:

  1. API Providers;
  2. API Customers; and
  3. Customers.

API providers (APs) are those who use Application Programming Interface (API) to avail data or service to another participant. They can be licensed financial institutions, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies such as cosmetics, beverages, drugs, etc. companies, retailers, payroll service bureau, etc.

API Customers (ACs) are those that use API released by APs to access data or service. They are the recipients of API containing the data or service of other customers.

Customers as participants are the data owners who shall be required to provide consent for the release of their data for the purpose of accessing financial services. They may provide consent whilst filling out a form, etc.

Open Banking Registry

By the Guidelines the CBN is expected to maintain and provide an Open Banking Registry (‘the Registry’). The Registry is charged with regulatory oversight functions for participants in open banking. Participants in open banking are required to be registered with the Registry and their details are to be held by the Registry. The Registry is also to maintain an API interface which would serve as the primary means by which API providers manage the registration of their API customers.

Responsibilities of API Providers and API Consumers

The Guidelines set out several responsibilities which APs and ACs are expected to comply with. These responsibilities provide rules for ensuring accessibility of open banking systems and procedures, transparency, cybersecurity, privacy protection, etc.  Some of these responsibilities are:

  1. Configuration management: APs and ACs are required to keep detailed inventory of open banking system configuration items in accordance with current Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) Standards. They are also to have automated configuration management (CM) processes and a configuration management policy.
  2. Execution of a Service Level Agreement (SLA): They are required to execute an SLA which is to contain provisions on accounting and settlement, fee structure, reconciliation of bills, registration, and sponsorship responsibilities. The fee structure is also to be publicly disclosed on their websites and applications.
  3. They are to ensure that all systems required for open banking are available, functioning optimally and meet up with the minimum standards on service monitoring, incident management, performance monitoring and event logging.
  4. They are to ensure that they meet the minimum performance standards for open banking systems. The Guidelines outlines several key performance indicators (KPIs) to ascertain compliance with the minimum performance standards. One of such KPI is that where the average API total processing time is less than 3 seconds, it would be considered as ‘operational’, where it is less than or equal to 7 seconds, it would be considered as ‘suspect’, and where it is greater than 7 seconds, it would be considered as ‘critical’.
  5. APs and ACs are required to maintain Business Continuity Plan (BCP) which are to among other things, indicate the architecture of the Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) and Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) infrastructure, trigger events, processes for failover and fail-back, and includes quarterly failover exercises and review of processes. The Guidelines also sets the threshold for failover and fail-back procedures as ’30 minutes of downtime’. They are also required to implement Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) which may also be entrenched in the BCP. The plans are to be tested every 6 months. Whilst CBN is to oversee testing procedures, it is the responsibility of ACs and APs to provide the facilities for testing.
  6. They are to ensure that they have problem management systems in place. The problem management system is aimed at managing incidents known to be recurring and which are not resolved under the SLAs. APs and ACs are to maintain a Problem Register which is to be made available to regulators, auditors, risk, and control teams within the organization. The problem management system is to be always electronic, or cloud based.
  7. They are to ensure compliance with interface requirements. Some of these requirements are ensuring that interfaces between APs and ACs are 100% electronic, the data interchange format must be JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) and ensuring that the data standard for financial transactions are model based on ISO 20022 or any other global applicable minimum standard.
  8. ACs and APs are to ensure that they maintain best competition practices. They are to comply with the provisions of section 2 of the Code of Conduct for the Nigerian Banking Industry which guards against unethical practices/unprofessional conducts by persons in the banking industry.
  9. They are to ensure that the data in their possession is well protected and are to set up effective information security management systems and are to ensure compliance with technical security standards and minimum-security principles as contained in US NIST CSRC.
  10. Change management obligations. They are required to collate change requirements and plan the changes for the next month. Changes to be made, whether pre-emptive or responsive are to be reported with sufficient details and in accordance with the prescribed notifications to be sent to all stakeholders that may be affected by such changes. The notifications are to be made in the following order:
  • 24 hours before the intended change
  • 1 hour before the intended change.
  • Immediately the change has been completed and the services have been confirmed restored.
  • 30 minutes after the change should have been completed but has been prolonged or failed.
  • At the point of commencing a change rollback.
  • When the services have been restored.

11. APs and ACs are required to have secure real-time communication platforms for first level incident responders within their organizations and respective ACs/APs for incident notification, investigation, and resolution. Emails are however not sufficient communication channels for incident management in open banking. The communication platforms are to accommodate text voice and video conferencing as effective modes of communication.

Termination of Agreement between Participants.

Any participant desirous of terminating a relationship is required to give the other party 20 business days’ notice of such termination. Where the relationship is terminated without notice due to fraud, abuse of service, etc. the AP is required to provide the AC with a report justifying the termination within 2 business days.

Policies/Frameworks to be Formulated under the Guidelines

ACs and APs are required to formulate the following policies:

  1. Data Governance Policies. These policies are to govern the way APs and ACs handle the data of customers. They are to be approved by a committee of its Board of Directors or at minimum, an executive management committee.
  2. Data Ethics Framework. The Data Ethics Framework is to provide the principles for collecting, collating, storing, analyzing, processing, etc. data. The Framework is also to provide consistent procedures for the documentation, verification, etc. of data to ensure compliance with extant laws and regulations.
  3. Data Breach Policy. This policy is aimed at preventing, managing, assessing, reviewing, etc. data breach.
  4. Configuration Management Policy. This Policy is to be approved by the AP’s or AC’s executive or board level information technology steering committee or an equivalent body not less than executive level.
  5. Risk Management Framework. This Framework is to set out guiding principles for the management and mitigation of risks. Participants are to have a risk management committee which is to consist of at least three members of senior management cadre.

Rendition of Returns/Reporting Obligations

One of the ways CBN safeguards the privacy rights of customers and ensure data security under the Guidelines is by mandating ACs and APs to render periodic returns to the CBN. The returns are to state the volume and value of transactions, the number of users, success and failure rates, security and fraud incidents, downtime reports and any other information as CBN may require from time to time.

Participants are also required to introduce an incident reporting portal to enable easy, efficient, and fast reporting of cybersecurity breach incidents.

ACs and Aps are to provide monthly API Consumers Reports to each other indicating among other things, statistics of incidents/problems, SLA compliance and aggregate impact in downtime or loss of service, the number and category of Fraud and Disputes with accompanying SLA performance, and the excerpts of the problem register indicating new, existing, and resolved problems.

ACs and APs are also required to make ‘Customer Reports’ to customers who have subscribed to one or more ACs stating among other things, transcript of ACs activities on the use of customer-permissioned data shall be provided to the customers at the minimum every month or for a period less than a month as may be requested by a customer, a transcript of each AC’s activities against the customer’s account/wallet for at least the last 30 days, etc.

Data Sharing

The Data of individuals is an intangible yet sensitive asset. The Guidelines provide for rules for data sharing with other (outsourced) service providers as well as between APs and ACs. Before APs share the data of a customer with ACs, they are to obtain the consent of the customer and authenticate the consent to ensure it emanates from the customer. This is to be done by putting in place Two Factor Authentication (2FA). The AC on the other hand is also required to furnish the customer with certain information such as its legal name, CAC registration number, means of identification in the open banking registry, access type and duration, means of withdrawal of consent, etc. for the consent obtained to be valid.

Intellectual Property

The Guidelines make provisions on IP issues and stipulates that the IP rights in any data or other information would always remain with the participant/party whom such data emanated from. Thus, parties are to be mindful of this provision while drawing up Agreements to ensure that no clause runs contrary to this stipulation.

Resolution of Complaints

By the Guidelines, participants are to stipulate how customers can lodge their complaints during the customer’s onboarding. Where there is a complaint, participants are required to acknowledge receipt of the complaint within 24 hours and are to resolve the complaint within 48 hours of its receipt.

Conclusion

It is important to emphasize that the Guidelines only applies to the exchange of data for the purpose of providing innovative financial services in Nigeria. Any organization that controls the data of its customers is now allowed to exchange it with other entities for the purpose of providing innovative financial services in Nigeria. However, before the information of customers are shared, their consents must be obtained, authenticated by API provider, and validated by the API customer. The Guidelines provides minimum security measures and risk management systems to be put in place to protect the information of customers. It sets out rules that would guard against the violation of the privacy rights of customers while promoting efficiency, financial inclusion, healthy competition, and customers’ access to services available to them in the financial service industry.

 

Please note that the contents of this article are for general guidance on the Subject Matter. It is NOT legal advice.

For further information or to see our other service offerings, please visit www.goldsmithsllp.com  or contact:

The post An Overview of CBN’s Operational Guidelines for Open Banking in Nigeria first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>
The Tax and Fiscal Regime under the Petroleum Industry Act 2021: Goldsmiths Solicitors PIA Series III https://goldsmithsllp.com/the-tax-and-fiscal-regime-under-the-petroleum-industry-act-2021-goldsmiths-solicitors-pia-series-iii/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-tax-and-fiscal-regime-under-the-petroleum-industry-act-2021-goldsmiths-solicitors-pia-series-iii Fri, 02 Sep 2022 15:52:18 +0000 https://jokewoods.com/?p=6473 In our third series examining the main provisions of the newly enacted Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), we consider some of the tax and fiscal provisions under the Act. The PIA…

The post The Tax and Fiscal Regime under the Petroleum Industry Act 2021: Goldsmiths Solicitors PIA Series III first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>

In our third series examining the main provisions of the newly enacted Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), we consider some of the tax and fiscal provisions under the Act. The PIA altered the administration of taxes and the payment of fees and levies in the Nigerian Petroleum Industry and makes changes aimed at encouraging investment in the Industry. The Act also sets out the agencies now in charge of the administration and collection of taxes and levies, and makes alterations on the rates, allowable and non-allowable deductions, etc. to be made in respect of taxes.

 

Responsible Agencies

The Agencies responsible for the administration and collection of taxes and other levies under the PIA are:

  1. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) – responsible for assessing and collecting Hydrocarbon Tax, Tertiary Education Tax and Companies Income Tax.[1]
  2. The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (the Commission) – responsible for determining and collecting royalties, signature bonuses, rents, production shares profit sharing or risk service provisions and other related payments;[2] and
  3. The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Regulatory Authority (the Authority) – responsible for the determination and collection of penalties on gas flaring arising from midstream operations.[3]

Applicable Taxes

The PIA has made some changes with respect to some aspects of taxes payable by operators. The Petroleum Profit Tax (PPT) will now be replaced with Hydrocarbon Tax (HT) and Companies Income Tax (CIT).

The Hydrocarbon Tax.

Hydrocarbon Tax (HT) are assessable taxes, chargeable on profits of Companies engaged in upstream petroleum operations in the onshore, shallow water and deep waters and it applies to crude oil, field condensates and natural gas liquids derived from associated gas and produced in the field upstream of the measurement points.[4] The following are not subject to Hydrocarbon Tax (HT):

  1. Associated gas produced which is not upstream of the measurement point[5];
  2. Any frontier acreage until it is reclassified to a general onshore[6].

 

The crude oil taxable under the HT is the value of chargeable oil adjusted to measurement point.[7] To determine Hydrocarbon Tax (HT), the adjusted measurement point, allowable deductions[8] adjusted profit and non-allowable deductions[9] are to be considered. In ascertaining the adjusted profit, penalties, litigation and arbitration costs, bad debts, financial/bank charges, etc. are not deductible.[10]

 

In determining the HT, the sum eligible for deduction in an accounting period is subject to the cost ratio limit of 65% of the gross revenue determined at measurement point.[11] Where deductions required to be made are not made in an accounting year, such deductions may be brought to FIRS’ notice within 5 months after the end of an accounting year or as extended by the FIRS[12] and may be deducted in the subsequent accounting year.[13] HT is payable in installments.[14] and its assessment, computation and payment is to be made in USD.[15]

 

The Act categorizes chargeable tax with respect to HT into two (2), namely:

  1. Profit on crude oil for Petroleum Mining Leases (PML) with respect to onshore and shallow water areas, which is 30% of the lessee’s profit; and
  2. Profit on crude oil for Petroleum Prospecting Licence (PPL) with respect to onshore and shallow water areas, which is 15% of the licensee’s profit.

Chargeable Persons under Hydrocarbon Tax

Generally, Companies engaged in Upstream petroleum operations are liable to be charged and to pay Hydrocarbon Tax. The following persons/companies are also subject to hydrocarbon tax:

  1. Any person or persons or partnership except companies and/or partnership between companies that engages and makes profit from upstream petroleum operations is liable to pay taxes in addition to provided penalties.[16]
  2. Companies engaged in upstream petroleum operations either as a Partnership, Joint Ventures or any other arrangement. These companies will be charged in proportion to the equity interest held respectively by them.[17]

Accounts/Returns to be Kept

The FIRS oversees the administration, assessment and collection of Hydrocarbon Tax. Companies assessable to Hydrocarbon Tax are required to keep and submit accounts to the FIRS.

 

Accounts of Profit and Loss

Companies engaged in Upstream Petroleum Operations relating to crude oil are required to make accounts of profits and loss within an accounting period and they are required to submit a copy of the accounts to the FIRS within 5 months of the accounting period or within 5 months from the effective date of the PIA.[18]

 

Returns of Profit and Loss

Companies engaged in upstream petroleum operations related to crude oil are also required to submit an estimated return of profits and loss not later than 2 months after the commencement of each accounting period. Where there is a change in price, cost or volume after filing of returns, the company will be required to submit further returns reflecting the change.[19]

 

Accounts or Returns on Bulk Sale or Disposal of Chargeable Oil

Every company yet to commence bulk sale or disposal of chargeable oil are to file its audited accounts or returns to the FIRS within 5 months after the 31st of December of each year for already existing Companies and 18 months for newly incorporated companies.[20]

 

 

Dispute on Hydrocarbon Tax

A company liable to pay Hydrocarbon Tax may deliver a self-assessment for any accounting period. The FIRS on the other hand may accept or refuse the assessment. Where the FIRS refuse the self-assessment or where such company fails to deliver a self-assessment, the FIRS may estimate an amount of tax to be paid. A dispute may arise from the estimate projected by the FIRS and the PIA provides for the channels to resolve such dispute as follows:

  • Pre-payment Dispute: Where before the payment of the HCT, a person in whose name an assessment was made disputes the assessment, such person may apply in writing to the Service for revision by way of a Notice of Objection within 30 days of service of assessment.[21] The time frame for service of Notice of Objection may be extended by the FIRS. Where the assessment/estimated tax is not amended, the person may apply to the Tax Appeal Tribunal.[22]
  • Post-payment Dispute: any person who claims that there is an excessive or erroneous assessment in respect of a paid HT is to apply to the FIRS within 6 years from that accounting period in which the payment was made.[23]

 

 

Companies Income Tax under the Petroleum Industry Act

Companies in the upstream, midstream and downstream petroleum sector are liable to pay Companies Income Tax (CIT) and are subject to the provisions of the Companies Income Tax Act. In determining CIT, Hydrocarbon Tax is not deductible.[24] Production bonuses and signature bonuses paid for the acquisition of rights in or over petroleum deposits, signature bonuses or fees paid for renewing Petroleum Mining Lease or Petroleum Prospecting License, etc. are also not deductible for Companies Income Taxation.[25]

 

In addition to deductions generally applicable to companies for the purpose of CIT, royalties, rents, payments made by a holder of a Petroleum Mining Lease to the Federation Account relating to production sharing, profit sharing, etc. are deductible for the purpose of calculating CIT.

The Funds of the Host Communities Development Trust[26] as well as the 3% annual contribution of the Settlor(s) are to be deducted for the purpose of both hydrocarbon Tax and Companies Income Tax.[27]

 

A person who intends to carry on the business of more than one stream is to incorporate different companies for each stream and the companies when incorporated shall each be liable to pay CIT. However, companies with a Petroleum Mining License will not be charged any stamp duties or capital gains tax with regards to the segregation.[28]

 

Furthermore, withholding tax on dividends at 10% and Tertiary Education Tax (TET) of 2% of assessable profits will still be applicable however unlike under the PPTA, TET will not be tax deductible. Bank charges have also now been included as expenses which are not tax deductible.

The PIA also replaces the Investment Tax Allowance (ITA) and Investment Tax Credit (ITC) with a Production allowance per crude oil production.

 

 

Payment of Rent and Royalties

Holders of Petroleum Prospecting License and Petroleum Mining Lease are required to pay rent and royalties on a yearly basis and per hectare. The payment of such rent and royalties are to be paid into the Federation Account and verified by the Commission. Royalties may be paid in cash or in kind.

Where any of this remains unpaid to the Government for a period of 30 days, it is regarded as a debt with interest accruing. These payments cannot be waived or discounted.

 

 


Conclusion

The PIA introduced several changes to the fiscal and tax regimes in the Nigerian Petroleum Industry. These changes are aimed at making Nigeria attractive for Petroleum operations. The Act has also introduced several changes in the rate of taxation and levies in the industry, applicable taxes, the agencies responsible for the collection of revenue, allowable and non-allowable deductions, etc. It is however important to state that this new tax regime is only applicable to holders of the new licenses under the Act and persons operating under the Oil Prospecting License and the Oil Mining lease interested in benefitting from the new tax rates, will be required to convert to the new licenses applicable under the Act.

 

Generally, the fiscal and tax regimes in the PIA apply to various operators in the Petroleum Industry and thus, are not exhaustive. Operators in the sector are advised to seek further advise on areas peculiar to them.

Watch out for the concluding part of our PIA series which is to be published next week. This shall deal with the establishment of the Host Communities Fund introduced by the PIA.

 

Please note that the contents of this Article are for general guidance on the Subject Matter. It is NOT legal advice.

For further information or to see our other service offerings, please visit www.goldsmithsllp.com or contact us.

 



[1] Section 259 (a) Petroleum Industry Act 2021.

[2] Ibid, Section 259 (b)

[3] Ibid, Section 259 (c).

[4] Ibid, Section 260 (1) (a)

[5] Ibid, Section 260 (2)

[6] Ibid, Section 260 (3)

[7] Measurement point is a point to be determined in the field development plan when calculated for Royalties purpose, where not determined, a directly downstream from the flow station in the PML; or where the measurement takes place outside the PML, a deemed measurement point in the PML based on a calculation approved by the Commission.

[8] Ibid, Section 263 (1) and 266.

[9] Ibid, Section 264

[10] Ibid, Section 264

[11] Ibid, Item 2(1) of the 6th Schedule

[12] Ibid, Section 265 (4)

[13] Ibid, Section 265 (3)

[14] Ibid, Section 291

[15] Ibid, Section 287

[16] Ibid, Section 273 (1)

[17] Ibid, Section 273 (3)

[18] Ibid, Section 277 (1) & (2)

[19] Ibid, Section 280

[20] Ibid, Section 277 (3)

[21] Ibid, Section 285 (1) & (2)

[22] Ibid, Section 288

[23] Ibid, Section 295 & 296

[24] Ibid, Section 302 (5)

[25] Ibid, Section 303 (12)

[26] Ibid, Section 256

[27] Ibid, Section 257 (1)

[28] Ibid, Section 302 (3)

 



 

The post The Tax and Fiscal Regime under the Petroleum Industry Act 2021: Goldsmiths Solicitors PIA Series III first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>
Pay You are Damned, Don’t Pay You are Damned: The Nigerian VAT Conundrum https://goldsmithsllp.com/pay-you-are-damned-dont-pay-you-are-damned-the-nigerian-vat-conundrum/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pay-you-are-damned-dont-pay-you-are-damned-the-nigerian-vat-conundrum Fri, 02 Sep 2022 04:42:57 +0000 https://jokewoods.com/?p=6391 On 9 August 2021, following the legal action commenced by the Rivers State Government, the Federal High Court (FHC) sitting in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, declared the collection of Value…

The post Pay You are Damned, Don’t Pay You are Damned: The Nigerian VAT Conundrum first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>
On 9 August 2021, following the legal action commenced by the Rivers State Government, the Federal High Court (FHC) sitting in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, declared the collection of Value Added Tax (VAT) by Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS) as unconstitutional.[i]

 

The court held that FIRS lacks the power to impose and collect taxes not mentioned in items 58 and 59 of part I of the Second Schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and that the states constitutionally have the powers to do so. Following this decision, the Rivers State government immediately enacted the Rivers State Value Added Tax Law.

 

This was followed by Lagos state, which also enacted its own state VAT law.  Since then, a lot more state governments in Nigeria have followed suit and either enacted their own state VAT laws or indicated a readiness to do so. Some other State Governments have on the other hand, backed the idea that the FIRS should be the agency with the responsibility of collecting VAT in all the states.

 

With no end in sight to this, it now appears that the Nigerian taxpayers are in the middle of what is clearly an un-ending VAT turf war between the Federal and State governments.

 

 

Origin of the VAT Tug of War

Nigeria operates a federal system of government made up of 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory situated in Abuja. The Constitution of Nigeria sets out some items that are on the exclusive legislative list: items over which the Federal Government only has powers to legislate upon, whilst some are on the concurrent list, meaning that either the States or Federal Government can make law in that regard.

 

Consequently, any item not on the exclusive legislative list and the concurrent legislative list falls within the exclusive preserve of the States and Local Governments to legislate on. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law that is inconsistent with the Constitution is void to the extent of that inconsistency.[ii]

 

Section 7 of the Value Added Tax Act 1993[iii] empowers the FIRS (a federal agency) to collect VAT in Nigeria. As a result, the FIRS has been collecting VAT on behalf of the (Federal Government), which is then paid into the federation account and distributed to the state governments using the federation sharing formula.

 

The debate of who has the right to collect VAT has been going on for some time, culminating in the commencement of a legal action by the Rivers State Government. Judgement was delivered in favour of Rivers State Government on 9 August 2021. This judgement was seen as a victory by many of the State Governments as they have for a long time clamoured for more financial autonomy from the Federal government. Some State Governments immediately enacted their own VAT laws and set motion in place to commence collection of VAT at state level.

 

Obviously disappointed with this judgement, which would mean a big dip in the revenue of the Federal Government, the Federal Government appealed to the Court of Appeal (CA) with an application for a stay of execution. The CA has ordered that the parties should maintain status quo(the position prior to the initial judgment at the FHC) pending the determination of the appeal.

 

The Rivers State Government has filed an appeal at the Supreme Court challenging the order of the CA which requires the parties to maintain the status quo. The Supreme Court is yet to hear that application or make an order on it.

 

The Lagos State Government has on the other hand applied to the Court of Appeal to be joined as a party to the proceedings. Prior to applying to be joined to the suit, Lagos State has maintained that it will carry on with the collection of VAT since it is not a party to the suit and thus not bound by the decision of the Court of Appeal ordering the parties to maintain status quo.

 

In the meantime, businesses as collection agents, are now caught in the middle of the VAT conundrum as they are unsure who to remit the VAT so far collected to.

 

 

The Fate of Taxpayers

This is no doubt a very confusing time for businesses which according to the VAT laws, act as collection agents on behalf of the government and are required to file and remit VAT returns on a monthly basis. Businesses have to be careful with respect to making decisions about whether or not to remit VAT to either FIRS or state tax authorities.

Making tax remittance to either FIRS or state tax authorities could be further complicated for businesses, depending on how the judgment of the CA and ultimately the Supreme Court goes.

 

If VAT is remitted to the FIRS and the State Governments are later successful in the litigation, the State Governments are likely going to issue demands to businesses, thus leading to a situation where businesses will potentially be filing and remitting twice for the same VAT. If no VAT is remitted, then the businesses are of course in breach of the VAT laws that require returns and remittance on a monthly basis. The likely consequence is that the taxpayers could be faced with a situation where they receive simultaneous tax remittance notices from both FIRS and state tax authorities. It appears that business are damned if they pay and damned if they don’t pay.

 

 

Navigating the Conundrum

As the crisis persists, what can businesses do to avoid being caught in what is clearly a case of two elephants fighting. The organised private sector should in our view form pressure groups, engage the State and Federal Governments to give some form of comfort to businesses pending the determination of the matters pending in court.

 

Trade Associations and professional bodies could make applications to be joined as interested parties to the pending court cases, that way any decision made by the court becomes binding on them and that decision could be used as a defence to any tax authority be it state of federal that issues a tax demand. In order to anticipate any demand for back pay, businesses could come together for example through their various bodies and make applications to the court to enable them open separate interest yielding accounts, where VAT so far collected could be warehoused, pending the determination of the court cases.

 

 

Conclusion

The recent decision of the FHC which declared the collection of VAT by the FIRS as unconstitutional has been welcome by some experts as a first step toward achieving true fiscal federalism in Nigeria. However this has created a conundrum for businesses that act as collection agents on behalf of the government. Litigation in Nigeria takes years to conclude and this confusion might well take some time to conclude through the court. Businesses need to be very creative in the manner in which they try to navigate this conundrum as it appears that neither the State nor Federal Governments are prepared to shift ground.  Businesses have to be very careful before making any decision whether to remit VAT to the State or Federal Government.

 

Please note that the contents of this Article are for general guidance on the Subject Matter. It is NOT legal advice. For further information or to see our other service offerings, please visit www.goldsmithsllp.com or contact us.

 


 


[i] Ag Rivers State v. FIRS Suit no FHC/PH/CS/149/2020

[ii] Section 1 (3) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended)

[iii] No. 102, 1993 Amended by the Value Added Tax Amendment Act, 2007

 



 

The post Pay You are Damned, Don’t Pay You are Damned: The Nigerian VAT Conundrum first appeared on Goldsmiths Solicitors.

]]>